It is of considerable interest to trace where the ancient Sumerians came from because of their major contribution to human civilization. It has been suggested that the Sumerians appeared in southern Mesopotamia some 5,500 years ago, carrying with them the seeds of civilization. It was also suggested that they migrated from the west coast of India. The fact that they were not a local people is suggested by the fact that their language belongs to an entirely different and isolated group. There are two other lines of research that can be adopted to confirm this hypothesis. The first is to explore other groups in India with a similar language and the second is to conduct a physical examination of currently available Sumerian skeletons for racial similarities.

In western India there are a number of tribal groups that have existed since ancient times. Today, many live on the fringes of mainstream communities, such as those that exist in India today. The main communities belong to the Indo-Aryan or Dravidian language groups. Sumerian belongs to neither. Tribal-wise, it is now useless to look for similarities between Sumerian and the current tribal languages ​​in India because for thousands of years their original languages ​​have disappeared due to the overwhelming influence of other languages. Western tribal communities in India now speak modified versions or mixtures of the main languages. However, all is not lost because although the tribals in India like the kols and the bheels have been greatly influenced, the same is not true of some of their branches that migrated further east to Australia in ancient times, and form a branch of the same human groups. . One can then look for similarities between the Sumerian and Austrian languages. In fact, this study has already been carried out and the consensus is resounding, yes. The Austrian languages ​​are in fact similar to ancient Sumerian. The similarities are so numerous and clear that they are beyond doubt or the result of any chance coincidence. (The Austrian Origin of the Sumerian Language, Language Form, vol. 22, no.1-2, January-December 1996).

Therefore, it can now be said with confidence that ancient Sumerian is not a linguistic isolate. It belongs to the group of Australoid/Austrian languages. They belong to this group because the ancient tribal peoples of the west coast of India also belonged to the same group of people, and it is from here that they must have migrated to Mesopotamia. Both the Australoid and Austric types are found in India. There are clear reasons to rule out any other location for Sumerian migration: Western India is geographically close to southern Mesopotamia compared to Southeast Asia and Australia, and there are no known instances of civilization east of the Indus Valley some five thousand years ago. . Such evidence has been found in the Indus Valley.

The second study concerns the physical examination of the Sumerian skulls. Buxton and Rice found that of the 26 Sumerian skulls they examined, 22 were Australoid or Austrian. Furthermore, according to Penniman, who studied skulls from other Sumerian sites, the Eurafrican, Austrian, and Armenoid Australoids were the “racial” types associated with the Sumerians. Here is Penniman’s description of the Austric type found in Sumer:

“These people are of medium height, with build and hair like those of Euro-Africans, to whose race they are allied with dark eyes and oval faces, broad noses, rather weak jaws, and slender, sinuous bodies.”

This description also closely describes the actual person seen on a famous Indus Valley clay tablet. This same tribe in an evolved version undoubtedly established the Indus as well as the Sumerian civilization after the submergence of their coastal cities. In northwestern India they would have encountered Neolithic peoples of Indo-European origin with whose labor they established the Indus cities. An analysis of skeletal remains from the Indus Valley confirms this mix. Both the Indosumerian-Austrian language must have persisted side by side as in Mesopotamia with the official language of the rulers being Indosumerian-Austrian. Just as in Mesopotamia, ancient Sumerian was replaced by the language of the majority (Akkadians), in the Indus Valley it would have been eventually replaced by an Indo-Aryan language. It is not known for sure at what precise point in history this occurred, but it is most likely that the Sumerian language disappeared from India in 2000 BC. In the latter case, it was not a matter of preserving it for ritual purposes. This is because the Indosumerian-Austrian language never developed as a fully written language in India to inscribe full texts. In any case, a better Indo-Aryan language soon emerged with its own full script, probably due to Hittite influences on the Indian subcontinent at the time.

Contribution of the Armenians to ancient civilization

In the Indus valley from which the Sumerians arose there were other tribes who lived very close to the Austrian Sumerians. These were prehistoric Indo-Aryan tribes of Armenian origin, followers of the god Ara. The Indo-Aryans were light-skinned and light-haired. Hence the reason why the Indo-Sumerians label themselves dark-headed compared to the Ara people who glowed. The Sumerians also began to use the word Ara for fair and brilliant and eventually labeled all Indo-Aryan people as Ara or Arya. The word Armenian has its origin in AR-MA, that is, the children of Ara and Ma, the Goddess of fertility.

The later Indo-Aryan migrations from around 1500 B.C. C. towards the Indus regions were apparently of Hittite origin. Some intermarriage between these Indosumerians and Armenians also apparently took place, probably leading to a more vigorous community than would otherwise have been possible. A physical marriage also resulted in a marriage of the religious traditions of the Sumerian and Armenian tribes, as well as the Armenian-influenced Sumerian language. Such influences can be found by comparisons between the Armenian language (or even Hungarian which grew out of ancient Armenian) and the Sumerian language. Are was the Sun God, and the roots of sun worship in the world seem to be of Aryan rather than Sumerian origin.

Archaeologists refer to the Transcaucasus region, including modern Armenia, as the oldest known prehistoric culture in the area, carbon dated to approximately 6000–4000 BCE. A recently discovered tomb dates back to 9000 BC. Another early culture in and around the Armenian highlands, the Kura-Araxes culture, is assigned the period of ca. 4000 – 2200 BC The Armenians are one of the oldest Indo-European subgroups. Therefore, it is not surprising that among the Aryans it was the Armenians who first spread throughout the ancient world of Mesopatomy and the Indus Valley. The Hittite Aryans who became more powerful than the Armenians around 1500 B.C. C. were close neighbors and racial cousins ​​of the Armenians, sometimes clashing with them and sometimes coexisting, but probably gaining form in the interaction at all times.

Buxton and Rice found that of 26 Sumerian skulls they examined, 22 were Australoid or Austrian and four were Armenoid. Furthermore, according to Penniman, who studied skulls from other Sumerian sites, the Eurafrican, Austrian, and Armenoid Australoids were the “racial” types associated with the Sumerians. Certainly, it cannot be confirmed without further investigation whether the Sumerian-Armenian alliance took place on Sumerian or Indian soil. It is also not certain if it was forced or voluntary. Light-skinned Armenian ladies may have considered broad-nosed, dark-nosed Sumerians ugly. However, it can be deduced that the first Sumerians who introduced civilization to our world were about 85% Austrian and 15% Aryan Armenian.

It is surprising that one of the most significant contributions to humanity comes from the Austrian/Australoid races. Elsewhere his contribution has not been remarkable. However, apparently a small genetic change is all that is needed for this achievement. Similar races have illustrated that this can happen elsewhere as well. An example of that is Cambodia’s Angkor Wat which illustrates technical mastery on an unprecedented scale, noted for its architectural and artistic perfection, not to mention its sheer size, Angkor Wat is the most famous and certainly the most remarkable of all temples. old. with extraordinary architectural and artistic innovations, one of the greatest achievements of humanity.