Net neutrality: it is not true if it is biased:

The cat is out of the bag. What should have been done in a more cautious way is spread all over the place in the name of regulation. It had to be done and it had to be accounted for. The Internet had become a bit like Bitcoin, everyone wanted to own it, but no one understood where it came from, where it was, and where it was all headed. In short, no one was willing to claim responsibility for what they were seeing. Online independence had taken a wrong turn and everything was unaccounted for. YouTube has now hired nearly 10,000 reviewers who will review objectionable content on your site. Why wasn’t it done before? Why did this have to take its toll by degrading democracy, when there were anti-democratic ads being published by outlets of uncertain origins? And if the origins were unclear, why wasn’t the projected content scrutinized or assumed to be politically correct? Did any claims now have the potential to become news? That’s where the term “Fake News” was coined and nowadays anyone who doesn’t subscribe to your view calls it “Fake News”. Instead of what has been considered a clear and further tilt of the electoral scale, through an inaccurate projection of information and content. Obama’s “Yes We Can” brought victory to him via Facebook and now suddenly the free internet had the license to stream, page or stream anything, no matter its validity or claim.

Repealed by FCC- there is a lot of populism, shouting and shouting against the 3 to 2 vote statement. Many even claim that up to 2 million comments recorded in the survey are fake and not made by real Americans. Is it taking turns on the musical chairs or just going around in circles? It is not safe or clear, but the step goes in the extreme opposite current, against the will of the people. Staining the soul of free speech and invading privacy at the same time. The power of the media was used against itself, and the spirit of free speech was used to undermine its own cross-control. Even the mainstream media started to use the internet as a source and thus were facing the same fire. It had to be corrected but not in this way.

Perhaps, this had become unavoidable at this point and at this stage. If the algorithms weren’t enough to track the videos, why didn’t YouTube take the stance to fix it then? Why unwanted ads were being broadcast and videos being posted before YouTube had to take the fair and obvious step. And as I’ve insisted throughout the book, just like printing, it’s a long-lasting proof and will never close or lose its entities. Likewise, humans will never run out of demand as supervisors, even if the whole world is locked in around automation. A group of machines cannot really decide the depth of the subjective moral spectrum of human society. Its derivatives, implications and tangents. All exercise, sense of purpose and direction is intended to induce proactivity in human end users. However, if prospective gains are prioritized and preferred over actual validation, scrutiny, and factual accuracy, then you will be putting yourself in jeopardy in the long run.

Now, a group of Internet service providers will decide where and when we should access the XYZ sites and how often we can visit them. This has been used against the common online surfer, who has nothing to do but check email, use social media, and can shop online. You are paying the price for a few individuals who created an autocratic environment in the name of automation and technological leapfrog. These few cheated every user out of their basic rights just because, as Barack Obama said about the 2008 economic collapse as unprecedented and unsupervised negligence.

Only this time, the jolt is in the form of a data crash. Where, on the one hand, there will be fierce competition as monopolies will start to crumble in the name of a level playing field. However, on the other hand, there will be strict authoritative control regarding open browsing. The floating ideas of the free world in a capitalist economy have been regulated like never before. But this above is a reminder of the responsibilities that come along with the power of information or any resource for that matter. It may have seemed like an automatic right, benefit, and privilege, but it became useless because it was misused. Liberty was abused by violating and obstructing the rights of others to use it in the just way they intended. User-generated content was marginalized without proper control, let alone without the potential to produce it all. Everyone was so busy enjoying the laurels of user-generated content and making real profits from it that they forget why and how they should take the time, step back, relax, and reflect on what is credible and ethical enough to share openly. .

Justice and truth must prevail; the neutrality clause must remain impartial. In the true sense of the word and with all the justice in the world. No one should kidnap the truth well told.