Getting rich seems to be the most elusive and the hardest to catch. Many have written about ways to get rich with the desire to present this seemingly difficult endeavor that seems attainable. Although many of these works present many different ideas, sometimes one can get lost in a quagmire of suggestions and prescriptions that ends up complicating matters even more.

However, two papers on this topic stand out from the rest for one important reason. In fact, they simplify things to the point of presenting the law of success in about 16 lessons. These works are Science of Getting Rich and Law of Success/Think of Grow Rich written by Wattles and Hill respectively.

Although they were written a few years apart and although each work has its own unique presentation, they actually complement each other. They bring out the same principles while presenting them in their own special, distinctive and exceptional way. The science of getting rich begins by telling everyone that they have the right to get rich, but this requires a systematic approach that can be called the science of getting rich.

Think and Grow Rich argues that getting rich is a definite primary goal, a right if you will, and also requires a systematic approach, called the law of the master mind. Now it’s about recognizing the path to get rich. Wattles first discusses the first principles in the science of getting rich, and soon goes on to list the value that one must investigate. He talks about increasing life, gratitude, thinking in a certain way, how to use the will, acting in a certain way, getting into the right business, and ends with the impression of increase, the advancement of man, and some final cautions and remarks.

Minus the final lesson that summarizes the points, Wattles breaks down the science of getting rich in 16 lessons. Hill immediately dives into the values ​​one must foster to become rich, which he says include self-confidence, the habit of saving, initiative and leadership, imagination, enthusiasm, self-control, getting more out of that is paid, a pleasant personality, a precise thought. , precise thinking, concentration, cooperation, taking advantage of failure and tolerance. He ends with the golden rule. He basically presents the law of success in 16 lessons.

The Law of Success in 16 Lessons is the specific significant difference that can be anticipated when it comes to these two successful books. The 16 lessons actually represent the simplification of an otherwise difficult task that anyone who wants to succeed in getting rich faces and at some point ends up dreading. Simplification is key to both Wattles and Hill’s work. Simplification means making your prescriptions accessible and realistic. Simplification ultimately means success. Simplification means getting rich.

Ultimately, Wattles and Hill are therefore making the same basic point. There is nothing complicated on the way to get rich. It’s all within the reach of anyone serious enough to have that desire to get rich demonstrated by a willingness to do something about it. Wallace calls it a science. Hill calls it the law of the master mind. Both are simple and succinct systematic approaches to follow.

There is no long and winding road to thread, just a short and straight to the point path to success. Getting rich is the result of doing the right things at the right time. He who does things well becomes rich. He who does not do things well, even if he continues to make an effort, will continue to be poor. This is not based on anything beyond one’s reach. However, the path to getting rich begins with knowing how to keep everything simple and how to focus your eyes on the systematic race to success.

There will be no need to do many things. It is clear from the suggestions made in these two works that by doing exactly what they prescribe, success is inevitable. This is what simplifies things. Just do what is said. The two masterpieces clearly describe in 16 very simple lessons the qualities that one must possess in order to achieve success. It’s all a matter of knowing what these qualities are. Or maybe it’s a matter of seeing how simple things really are.